[University home]

Public Engagement at Manchester

Sense about Science Media free workshop for researchers (Manchester 29 March)

Sense about Science is delighted to announce that applications are open for the popular ‘Standing up for Science’ workshop.

Early career researchers are invited to join us in Manchester on 29 March 2019. (5 priority places allocated to UoM researchers).
https://senseaboutscience.org/activities/voys-workshop/

This free workshop is aimed at early career researchers in all social sciences and STEM fields (PhDs, post-docs or equivalent welcome). At these day-long events, participants get the chance to hear directly from and ask questions of: researchers with experience in public engagement, science journalists, and policymakers. It is an opportunity to learn how the media works, how evidence can inform policy, what journalists and policymakers want and need from researchers, and how to involve the public in communicating your research.

Details and registration for the workshop at: https://senseaboutscience.org/activities/voys-workshop/
(Applications of interest due: 28 February 2019)

Please get in touch with me if you have any questions at all: Hamid Khan – hamid@senseaboutscience.org

Hamid Khan
Public Engagement Coordinator

Standing Up For Science Media Workshop – 8 April, Manchester

Sense About Science will be holding a Standing up for Science media workshop at the University of Manchester on Friday 8 April 2016.

This full day event is free and for early career researchers and scientists in all sciences, engineering and medicine (PhD students, post-docs or equivalent in first job).

During the workshop we combine discussion about science-related controversies in media reporting with practical guidance and tips for how to deal with the media.

Further information here:
http://www.senseaboutscience.org/data/files/VoYS/2016/Manchester/VOYS_workshop_Manchester_flyer_2016.pdf

And a workshop review from one of last year’s University of Manchester participants here:
https://manchestersteps.wordpress.com/2015/06/09/standing-up-for-science-means-asking-for-evidence/

These workshops are very popular and places are limited. Closing date for applications is Thursday 24 March.

To apply, send a CV and cover letter explaining your reasons for applying to Joanne Thomas, email: jthomas@senseaboutscience.org

The University of Manchester is a partner organisation for this event, so be sure to state this in your application – as partners hold five priority places for this workshop.

Posted by: Dee-Ann Johnson, Researcher Development Communications Officer, Faculty of Engineering & Physical Sciences, The University of Manchester

Twitter: @epsgrads | @uomengage

Standing up for Science Media Workshop – 27 March 2015, Manchester

Standing up for Science Media Workshop – 27 March 2015, 10:30am – 5pm University of Manchester, University Place 6.207 (Apply by 13 March)

Are you passionate about your research? Do you think it is important for good science and evidence to be communicated to a wider audience? What can you do to address scientific misconceptions and misinformation? Then the Standing up for Science media workshop is for you.

Who is this for? This free one day event is open to early career researchers in all sciences, engineering and medicine (PhD students, post-docs or equivalent in first job).

What is covered? This one day workshop will explore the following areas:

Science in the media: What happens when research announcements go wrong; statistics are manipulated; risk factors are distorted; or discussions become polarised?

What journalists are looking for: How do journalists approach stories and balance the need for news and entertainment with reporting science? And deal with accusations of polarising debates and misrepresenting facts?

Standing up for science; the nuts and bolts: This session offers practical guidance for early career researchers to get their voices heard in debates about science; how to respond to bad science when you see it; and top tips for if you come face-to-face with a journalist!

How to apply: Our workshops are very popular and there are only 40 places available. Please send your CV and short cover letter to Joanne (jthomas@senseaboutscience.org) by Friday 13 March 2015.

Note: Be sure to indicate in your cover letter that you are a researcher from the University of Manchester, as we a hosting this event we have been allocated a number of priority places.

Read a workshop review from some of our researchers who took part in previous sessions:

Sense About Science is a small charity that equips people to make sense of science and evidence. Follow us on Twitter | @senseaboutsci | @voiceofyoungsci | #VoYS

Voice of Young Scientist Workshop – Manchester 2014

A personal perspective from Samantha Winkler…

On Friday 14 March, I had the pleasure of attending a Media Workshop for young researchers run by Voice of Young Science (part of Sense about Science). There’s a summary of the day on their website but here I provide my own brief summary before launching into a few posts about the topics discussed.

The day was divided into three main parts: a panel session with scientists, a panel session with journalists and a tips & tricks discussion session. These were interspersed with group work (which I wasn’t took keen on – I don’t think the venue was suited for it and the questions too simplistic).

Anyway. Scientists.

On the panel were the ever awesome Matthew Cobb (@matthewcobb), Susanne Shultz (@Susanne_Shultz) and Jeffrey Forshaw (@jrf1968). As I have done my undergraduate and Masters degree(s) here in Manchester, I was familiar with Matthew Cobb who is one of the most dynamic and interesting lecturers I’ve ever had. If you ever have the chance to hear him lecture on biodiversity, don’t miss it!

Instead of taking notes, I was tweeting fairly heavily during this session, probably fuelled by the copious amounts of coffee provided at the workshop. So check out my tweets tagged #VoYSmediaworkshop for that!

The panelists all introduced themselves with little anecdotes that would come to form the main themes of the discussions. Jeff Forshaw who has worked with Brian Cox (@ProfBrianCox) told of a time when he and Brian Cox gave a talk they hadn’t prepared for – despite that their obvious familiarity with the subject matter and a few key points they knew they wanted to mention got them through.

Don’t over prepare, talk about things you’re confident in and know a few key messages. Then you can connect the dots.

Susanne Shultz spoke about a few experiences with the media and where things had gone wrong.

When things go wrong, tell the media about it. Especially with online media, it’s easy for them to correct it so it’s worth telling them about problems. And always make sure to mention and credit your team.

Matthew Cobb spoke of various interactions he has had with the media, including a story of “a duck who thought it was a dog” (of course, it probably din’t really think that!).

Don’t be afraid to say no if the request is silly. It’s not worth your time. Especially broadcast media will take up a lot of your time so make sure you get something out of it (guaranteed airtime/money).

Despite briefly derailing into a discussion of atheism (conclusion: don’t be a militant atheist), the discussions focused about when and when not to interact with the media: while you shouldn’t be afraid to talk to them and reach out to get your research presented accurately, you can also say know when they start coming up with silly requests. And always talk about what you know best.

I tweeted less during the discussion with journalists, probably stuck in a lazy, content post-lunch daze. However, I found the discussion with journalists to be a little more controversial in some matters. Panelists were Victoria Gill (@Vic_Gill) from BBC and freelancing journalist David Derbyshire (@dderbyshire) who used to work for the Daily Mail. They did an excellent job of explaining how journalists work.

Victoria Gill spoke about a (maybe not so) typical “day in the life” when she was working on a story about elephants and voice recognition (BBC article here). This focused on the benefits of having good contacts with scientists, working quickly and getting a story into their internal BBC database where it can then be picked up by different BBC outlets.

David Derbyshire spoke about how despite the majority of the room leaning towards The Guardian (as proven by a show of hands), the Daily Mail has a huge readership and those readers are keen to know about science. While competition between science stories and other stories is huge, science stories do regularly feature and it is necessary to work together with the journalists to ensure they are as accurate as possible. The Daily Mail might not have the best reputation amongst scientists but it has the relevant readership so don’t decline working with them on getting your research publicised.

In the discussions, the two topics I most noticed were “the ivory tower” and “when should we start teaching outreach/science communication/media relations to students”. As I disagreed with some of the opinions thrown around the room I will be blogging about those separately (beat me with a large stick if I fail to do so!).

The tips and tricks session was also a very useful discussion of personal experiences and suggestions, as well as a great overview of what Sense about Science and Voice of Young Science do.

Overall, it was a great day that felt very inspiring. (As you can see, it inspired me to finally blog again, so that’s a start.)

Other participants have blogged about the workshop here and here.

This post is republished with permission.

Author: Samantha Winkler (@SamW812)
Source Acknowledgement: http://sciencemediasociety.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/voice-of-young-science-media-workshop/ 

Standing up for Science Media Workshop, 14 March 2014, Manchester

Sense About Science will be holding a Standing up for Science media workshop at the University of Manchester on Friday 14 March 2014, 10:30 – 17:00.

Are you passionate about your research? Do you think it is important for good science and evidence to be communicated to a wider audience? What can you do to address scientific misconceptions and misperceptions?

This full day event is free and for early career researchers in all sciences, engineering and medicine (PhD students, post-docs or equivalent in first job).

During the workshop we combine discussion about science-related controversies in media reporting with practical guidance and tips for how to deal with the media. Confirmed speakers include Victoria Gill, Science reporter at BBC; and Professor Matthew Cobb, University of Manchester.

Totally changed my perspective on the media and where scientists fit into news stories” – Previous participant

Please find further information at www.senseaboutscience.org/data/files/VoYS/VOYS_workshop_Manchester_flyer_2014.pdf

These workshops are very popular and places are limited.

To apply send a CV and cover letter explaining your reasons for applying to Victoria Murphy email: vmurphy@senseaboutscience.org.

The University of Manchester partners this workshop and holds five priority places, so please ensure you identify which organisation you are affiliated with.

Closing date for applications is Friday 28 February.

Standing Up For Science – Improving the relationship between science and the media

Louise Walker, a PhD researcher in the Faculty of Life Sciences attended the Standing Up For Science workshop hosted here at The University of Manchester on the 15 March 2013. Here are her thoughts…

Historically, scientists and journalists have never really got along. In general, scientists tend to be a little … mistrustful of the ability of a journalist to accurately portray their research to a wider audience. In return, journalists may find that scientists can be difficult to work with. The research the scientists present can also be a bit confusing or complicated. But they need each other. Scientists need journalists to get the message about their research across, and newspapers like to print science stories because their readers are interested in it.

Continue reading